WTF?! Lace closure from Pak Cosmetics

[petitefille]

I ordered a lace closure from Pak Cosmetics and this is what came in the mail:

I am extremely disappointed and wondering what recourse I have. I purchased a closure piece from them last year http://www.pakcosmetics.com//brand/...n-Dream-Hair/Original-Human-Hair-Closure.html and it was fine. I would have ordered the same one, but I wanted one with more surface area in the front.

Am I taking crazy pills or have they sent me the wrong product/falsely advertised?

I sent them an email just now but I am extremely upset, being I wanted to do my hair as soon as it came.

To me, this is what lace closures are supposed to look like: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&g...urce=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=BO9tUf-lCMWo2gX19YD4CA

ETA: This is the product I ordered http://www.pakcosmetics.com//brand/Royal-Imex/Zury/Zury-Q-HW-U-Lace-Closure.html

 

[petitefille]

Unfortunately, I see now that it says "U-Lace Closure", whatever that means. There is not lace anywhere though. It's all mesh.

 

[Keen]

It looks like they sent you what you ordered.... If you look at the link of the product you ordered, you will see the U part. It's just inside out.

 

[petitefille]

It looks like they sent you what you ordered.... If you look at the link of the product you ordered, you will see the U part. It's just inside out.

The product is called a "lace closure". There is no lace.

ETA: It's misleading because when you Google "U-Lace closure" nothing comes up. There's no such thing.

 

[Meritamen]

This makes me think of the invisble part closures. Guess it just makes less work for someone making a U-part wig. Nifty idea; I don't see how it's misleading.

ETA: Maybe closure isn't the best term for this product since one's hair would still have to cover the tracks, I assume, unlike an invisible part which is still meant for full head sew-ins.