Laela
Sidestepping the "lynch mob"
Interesting article..thought I'd share it.
Laela
No "Class Struggles" In Christianity
"Liberation theology" or the "social gospel" are terms used to refer to a movement that uses the Bible as a justification to support the struggle of the world's poor and/or "working people" against their "oppressors." While the Bible does indeed support social justice for all, it does not take sides in matters of economics, as the verses below prove. After all, Christianity is about religion, not local or national politics.
It has been suggested that "the Bible can be made to say almost anything" if one decides to do so, and that is surely very true. It's very easy to do deliberately, and probably just as easy to do without even realizing it. To illustrate that the Bible does not support any economic "class struggle," here's an example based on three hypothetical people, one rich, one poor and one middle class, each claiming to be "righteous" in God's sight because of their personal economic situation in life:
Person 1: "I'm the righteous one in God's sight because I'm poor. Here's my proof:"
An example of that is the parable of "Lazarus and the rich man" (Luke 16:19-31) in which the poor beggar Lazarus watched the cruel and unrighteous rich man burn, while Lazarus was in the bosom of kind and righteous Abraham - and yet during his lifetime, Abraham was himself very wealthy, having tons of gold and hundreds of servants (Genesis 13:2, 14:14). It's the behavior that matters in God's sight, "for The Lord sees not as man sees; man looks on the outward appearance, but The Lord looks on the heart." (1 Samuel 16:7 RSV)
Fact Finder: What was the apostle Paul's warning to those who taught other "gospels"?
Galatians 1:6-9
Laela
No "Class Struggles" In Christianity
by Wayne Blank
"For the body does not consist of one member but of many. If the foot should say, "Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body," that would not make it any less a part of the body. And if the ear should say, "Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body," that would not make it any less a part of the body. If the whole body were an eye, where would be the hearing? If the whole body were an ear, where would be the sense of smell? But as it is, God arranged the organs in the body, each one of them, as he chose. If all were a single organ, where would the body be? As it is, there are many parts, yet one body. The eye cannot say to the hand, "I have no need of you," nor again the head to the feet, "I have no need of you." On the contrary, the parts of the body which seem to be weaker are indispensable, and those parts of the body which we think less honorable we invest with the greater honor, and our unpresentable parts are treated with greater modesty, which our more presentable parts do not require. But God has so composed the body, giving the greater honor to the inferior part, that there may be no discord in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together." (1 Corinthians 12:14-26 RSV) There Is No "Class Struggle" In Christianity
It has been suggested that "the Bible can be made to say almost anything" if one decides to do so, and that is surely very true. It's very easy to do deliberately, and probably just as easy to do without even realizing it. To illustrate that the Bible does not support any economic "class struggle," here's an example based on three hypothetical people, one rich, one poor and one middle class, each claiming to be "righteous" in God's sight because of their personal economic situation in life:
Person 1: "I'm the righteous one in God's sight because I'm poor. Here's my proof:"
"Blessed are you poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you that hunger now, for you shall be satisfied. "Blessed are you that weep now, for you shall laugh. Blessed are you when men hate you, and when they exclude you and revile you, and cast out your name as evil, on account of the Son of man!" (Luke 6:20-22 RSV)
Person 2: "I'm the righteous one in God's sight because I'm middle class. Here's my proof:""give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with the food that is needful for me, lest I be full, and deny thee, and say, "Who is The Lord?" or lest I be poor, and steal, and profane the name of my God." (Proverbs 30:8-9 RSV)
Person 3: "I'm the righteous one in God's sight because I'm wealthy. Here's my proof:""Blessed is the man who fears The Lord, who greatly delights in his commandments! His descendants will be mighty in the land; the generation of the upright will be blessed. Wealth and riches are in his house; and his righteousness endures for ever." (Psalm 112:1-3 RSV)
Although these examples may lead some to believe that the Bible contradicts itself, it really doesn't because each example is based foremost on behavior (i.e. the italicized words in the Scripture examples), not the economic situation of the individual. There are righteous and wicked among the poor, there are righteous and wicked among the middle class, and there are righteous and wicked among the rich.An example of that is the parable of "Lazarus and the rich man" (Luke 16:19-31) in which the poor beggar Lazarus watched the cruel and unrighteous rich man burn, while Lazarus was in the bosom of kind and righteous Abraham - and yet during his lifetime, Abraham was himself very wealthy, having tons of gold and hundreds of servants (Genesis 13:2, 14:14). It's the behavior that matters in God's sight, "for The Lord sees not as man sees; man looks on the outward appearance, but The Lord looks on the heart." (1 Samuel 16:7 RSV)
Fact Finder: What was the apostle Paul's warning to those who taught other "gospels"?
Galatians 1:6-9
)
