BostonMaria
Well-Known Member
Wow
Jesus help us all
Sent from my fancy iPhone using LHCF
Jesus help us all
Sent from my fancy iPhone using LHCF
Senate Approves Bill that Legalizes Sodomy and Bestiality in U.S. Military
- Thread starter LucieLoo12
- Start date
lilanie
New Member
You're right Shimmie...
But then again, this is the same country that brought us religious icons/artifacts composed of feces and called it *art*.
I wonder if NAMBLA helped in a way or two? That's a criminal organization that's should be prosecuted under RICO or whatever law gets you in trouble for shouting *fire* in a public place.
But then again, this is the same country that brought us religious icons/artifacts composed of feces and called it *art*.
I wonder if NAMBLA helped in a way or two? That's a criminal organization that's should be prosecuted under RICO or whatever law gets you in trouble for shouting *fire* in a public place.
Guitarhero
New Member
????^^^ Bromances...I thought this was affirmation that men can cry and form good, strong relationships with other men without fear of being called "weak and gay."
As for pink, my ex had nice pink shirts...I don't mind them. It's just a color. It can be very masculine.
As for pink, my ex had nice pink shirts...I don't mind them. It's just a color. It can be very masculine.
mscocoface
Well-Known Member
Once being a military wife and the stories I know this is nothing new under the sun, it has been going on. When the military goes into different ports and countries it would make some of your heads spin as to what is available to them.
It was told in the Bible we should not be surprised. It is sickening none the less.
It was told in the Bible we should not be surprised. It is sickening none the less.
????^^^ Bromances...I thought this was affirmation that men can cry and form good, strong relationships with other men without fear of being called "weak and gay."
As for pink, my ex had nice pink shirts...I don't mind them. It's just a color. It can be very masculine.
It's the 'romance' added to the 'bro' that 'gays' it.
(Shimmie stands ... )
Why not Bro'ships (brother/friend relationships)? Or whatever happen to be 'Buddies'? Hopefully that hasn't changed into a 'gay term'.
I've never seen so many conversions of the English language now being connected to being gay. Why does everything have to be 'punked up'?
It's as if there is a conspiracy to lead all men into gay play, subliminal whispers (B'romance) to mislead men astray. Let men be men, for Heaven's sake.
I remember when I could easily say 'girlfriend' and everyone fully understood that it was my best friend and nothing was out of order. But now, it's 'misunderstood' unless people know you personally.
I don't have a problem with 'pink shirts' on men, just so long as it doesn't have ruffles and/or other feminine frills (sheer overlays, lace, etc.).
This is what I believe lilanie was sharing, adding to her list are little boys wearing pink 'tu-tus' and their moms and schools encouraging it by writing a book, "My Princess Boy". In addition to the princess boy are is a growing epidemic of 'like' situations where the parents are feminizing their sons.
Last edited:
All the more reason to keep the 'former' laws in place. The Military is just that, the Military. There's order and there are rules. It's for a reason. It teaches courage under fire so that when the 'enemy' attacks, the soldier is ready with a counter and doesn't retreat from the battle, but wins it.
lilanie
New Member
All the above. Men used to be proud of their masculinity and wanted nothing to do with anything that would question it... Even J.Edgar Hoover was a "man's man", even though he was a man's man...
Laela
Sidestepping the "lynch mob"
Why does the dog wag its tail?
Because the dog is smarter than the tail.
If the tail were smarter, it would wag the dog.
Because the dog is smarter than the tail.
If the tail were smarter, it would wag the dog.
nebulanorton
New Member
You know up until the 50's it wasn't uncommon for boy babies to wear pink and girls to wear blue? At the turn of the 20th century boys basically wore white "dresses" for dress-up until reaching a certain age. Yet most of our grandpas aren't gay. /shrug
And as for "metrosexuals"? If a man is considered less masculine because he grooms himself and cleans his fingernails so be it. I've dated both types and at least the metrosexuals do laundry and dishes lol
And I also wondered why we complain about men being emotionally unavailable then call them gay when we see their emotions.
Food for thought... :/
Sent from my DROID2 using DROID2
But there are scores of metro men who don't do laundry or dishes, let alone cook.
nebulanorton
New Member
But there are scores of metro men who don't do laundry or dishes, let alone cook.
Yes, that's true. I've heard some women describe guys who do the baby's laundry or have the meal prepared when the wife gets home as "metrosexuals." Frankly, I don't have time for these guys. It's about definitions.
Women are still way too locked in to feeling like we need to do all the housework/cooking even when we preach about being "modern." I'm a med student. My SO is a financial advisor. I don't think "damn, he's on the down low" when I come home and he's folding our baby's onesies. He's not the best cook, but I have friends whose partners will wait for them to come home (even if we've been at school for12 hours) to cook because they were raised to think cooking is what women do. LOL
Sent from my DROID2 using DROID2
lilanie
New Member
No, i didnt know that. I am again refering to what is being passed off as metrosexual - eyeliner, dark polish on nails/toes.
I said nothing about men showing emotion
. Emotion displayed with honesty is a wonderful thing.
lilanie
New Member
I am thinking of all of these subjects within the context of a Christian worldview, flipping through the Bible to see how things line up.
I am not concerned with what's modern or what's antiquated.
I say this in the spirit of Love (God) and mean no offense to anyone who sees differently.
I am not concerned with what's modern or what's antiquated.
I say this in the spirit of Love (God) and mean no offense to anyone who sees differently.
No, i didnt know that. I am again refering to what is being passed off as metrosexual - eyeliner, dark polish on nails/toes.
I said nothing about men showing emotion
Key Words: "Passed Off" ... as in hiding the truth of what's really going on. Men do not need eyeliner or painted nails and I better not see a man with painted toenails. That's just beyond necessary, be they ' metro, hetro, whatever the 'getaway with it' terms are today.
I'll take it further, I can't stand to see long nails on a man. It creeps me out. It's just not normal whether they are manicured or not.
lilanie
New Member
Key Words: "Passed Off" ... as in hiding the truth of what's really going on. Men do not need eyeliner or painted nails and I better not see a man with painted toenails. That's just beyond necessary, be they ' metro, hetro, whatever the 'getaway with it' terms are today.
I'll take it further, I can't stand to see long nails on a man. It creeps me out. It's just not normal whether they are manicured or not.
I agree... it's too feminine or alluding to the vampire culture and how did the first vampire (love at first bite/blacula/twilight/interview with a vampire) come about? a pact with Satan...
And, well it is within the realm of what we are talking about (letting things slip through the cracks) - Interview of a Vamp was an excellent representation with gloves off. Why you ask? Because when Kirsten dunst was "converted" that was pedophila (she stayed the same age) and when Brad Pitt was "converted" that was by Tom Cruise (homosexuality)...All ewwwwwwwwww, all connected, all yuck.
I agree... it's too feminine or alluding to the vampire culture and how did the first vampire (love at first bite/blacula/twilight/interview with a vampire) come about? a pact with Satan...
All ewwwwwwwwww, all connected, all yuck.
Pitt and Cruise ? 
No, No, No...
lilanie
New Member
No, No, No...
Sorry - I meant their characters in the movie Interview with a Vampire
Naw, I aint talkin bad about Zahara's daddy or Connor's daddy!
Sorry - I meant their characters in the movie Interview with a Vampire
Naw, I aint talkin bad about Zahara's daddy or Connor's daddy!
Whew ! Okay. Thanks for clearing that up. Now I can go back to my Pumpkin Spice Coffee/Cocoa
makeupgirl
Well-Known Member
Bestiality? Icky Ew. I mean if it was punishable by death in the Old Testament time, what do they think is going to happen now? I can now see the ASPCA commericals. I'm keeping my babies on lockdown.
Guitarhero
New Member
Try googling the issue...several states have had this on the docket just recently. I wonder what the SPCA thinks about all this.
I wonder what the SPCA thinks about all this.
HappilyLiberal
Well-Known Member
Ok....
(1) They removed the law that banned sodomy and at some point in history bestiality was connected to that law.
(2) The law banning sodomy was repealed because gays can now openly serve in the military so that part of the law was unworkable.
(3) Bestiality can still be prosecuted under the Uniform Code of Military Justice under article 134.
This whole brouhaha is nothing more than anti-gay activists attempting to argue, yet again, that telling the government to keep it's nose out of the bedrooms of two consenting adults will lead to sex between humans and animals.
(1) They removed the law that banned sodomy and at some point in history bestiality was connected to that law.
(2) The law banning sodomy was repealed because gays can now openly serve in the military so that part of the law was unworkable.
(3) Bestiality can still be prosecuted under the Uniform Code of Military Justice under article 134.
This whole brouhaha is nothing more than anti-gay activists attempting to argue, yet again, that telling the government to keep it's nose out of the bedrooms of two consenting adults will lead to sex between humans and animals.
SummerSolstice
New Member
SO! Does this mean that obviously this is already ocurring in the Military?
Men ought to know that this will cause their genitals to rot and fall off; don't they know about beastial diseases?
OOoooooooooooooo I'm sooooooo MAD!
AND futhermore, WHERE was President Obama to veto and to put a full stop to this mess ? ? ? ?
I hate to say this but things like this have me side-eying our dear president. I don't understand how he let this one fly. Maybe the sodomy but the bestiality???
Similar threads
